Yesterday the Supreme Court upheld the 2nd Amendment by a vote of 5-4 which knocked down the 32 year old gun ban in Washington D.C. Of the comments that came out in dissenting manner, I had to laugh at Sen. Frank Lautenberg’s the most… “Today, President Bush’s radical Supreme Court justices put rigid ideology ahead of the safety of communities in New Jersey and across the country.” Hmm… if the good Senator would stop and think for a second (wait, I’m asking a Senator to stop and think? How cruel of me…)
1. Washington D.C. has consistently been in the top five deadliest cities since the ban was put into place. Many times it was the homicide king of the U.S. Which should make one think;
a. Banning handguns didn’t stop people from killing each other.
b. Maybe the issue isn’t the weapon, the issue is the person doing the killing.
c. There may be a reason more and more states are passing conceal/carry laws because the citizens are demanding it. Could it be the citizens don’t trust the government to protect them? Or could it be the citizens realize the loss of this constitutional right is the first step to losing total freedom?
2. Unarmed societies still kill people. They just do it with other weapons and different methods. Poisoning, bludgeoning, strangling, stabbing, burning, running people over, etc. are just some of the more “humane” ways criminals dispatch innocent people. Wait… shouldn’t we be banning chemicals, baseball bats, knives, cars, hands, matches, burnable fuels, too? Or at least put a seven day waiting period on them all…
Yes Senator, I am a supporter of the rigid ideology set forth by a few brave souls who carved out a constitution amidst great controversy and inner derision. The rigid ideology came after the original constitution was written when some wise people said, “Wait. There are some inalienable rights that should never be taken away by a federal or centrist government if this nation is to survive as a republic and avoid dictatorship and tyranny. Those rights are freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, etc….” I dare say it is the ten rights from the bill of rights that keep the government somewhat honest (okay, honest may be a stretch) to the point they realize they can and should be held responsible for duties they were elected to or we, through our inalienable rights, will rise up to protect ourselves and our freedom.
Rigid ideology? Perhaps but I for one am glad it is there.